This elastic layout is fully liquid within the limits of given 'min-width' and 'max-width' values, of which the 'max-width' value depends on the User's choice of font-size in his/her own browser.
The layout relies on a wrapper-div with 'width' in percentage, 'max-width' defined in em and 'min-width' defined in px, for supporting browsers.
Container-elements inside the wrapper-div have their widths defined in percentage of the wrapper-div, thus they are self-adjusting.
Internet Explorer 6 (and older IE/win versions) get a reworked, mode-independent, IE-expression for simulation of 'max-width' relative to User's choice of font-size default, and min-width at Author's chosen value. This seems to be a slightly unusual approach, although the basics can be found at max-width in Internet Explorer. The rest about the IE-expression used can be studied at min/max expression forStrict/Quirks modes, and making IE/win work, with IE-expressions.
Important: This solution does not work in IE6, if there's even the slightest hint of Author's font-size choice declared on html, body or wrapper-div. It doesn't matter how an Author declares font-size on those layout-carrying elements, there simply can't be any declared font-size on those elements since the Author's choice will replace User's defaults in the IE-expression and mess up the calculation. That's how IE/win works.
There's no such limitation on elements further in, but font-sizes should be defined in '%' of base-font - which is User's default.
basics for wrapper:
- width: 99%;
- max-width: 60em;
- min-width: 552px;
Complete CSS found in source-code
- date: 29. May. 2006
- by: Georg Sørtun
- updated: 31. May. 2006
- updated: 18. Jun. 2006
- updated: 03. Aug. 2006
- updated: 08. Apr. 2007
good behavior confirmed in these browsers:
- Safari 2.0.3
- Firefox 220.127.116.11
- Opera 8.52 & 9.00
- Netscape 8.1
- IE7.0.05346 beta 2